| outlawauron said: 1) What is determined a quality product is subjective. If bugs were seen as a very bad thing, then every Bioware and Bethesda title wouldn't have been given any awards, because they're worst when it comes to that. 2) And I don't think any bug is left intentionally, and I do know that not knowing how many gamers play is a problem with testing. Many bugs are never encountered because the testers haven't done certain actions like someone who plays the game a lot would do (like the many hurry-up no huddle playbook glitches in NCAA). |
1) I'm talking more in a sense of software quality. Even Skyrim with it's endless bugs was a very good game, I'm just talking from a technical perspective (which is very important imo).
2) Those bugs are fine because it requires specific actions that a normal player won't do. Testers and developers shouldn't be penalize for those type of bugs, but bugs that happen just because you are walking should indeed be penalize.
Nintendo and PC gamer
