secpierre34 said:
butcherknife said:
secpierre34 said:
Accela said:
secpierre34 said:
Accela said:
secpierre34 said:
DJEVOLVE said:

|
|
|
|
|
|
I dont believe in evil, but saying you need evil to understand good is lame. There is absolutely no need to know about evil to know about "good"...there are enough natural events like diseases, hurricanes, earthquakes, accidents, fires, etc. that kill and hurt people to know about the opposite of that crap. Evil is completely unnesscary...and does not ensure we know about good.
|
I guess that depends on what you think evil is. Natural events that results in pain is evil to me. Without them you cant know what a good life is
|
Natural events cannot be evil by the definition of evil. Evil = profoundly immoral and malevolent. You think an earthquake is profoundly immoral and malevolent?