By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Slimebeast said:
soulfly666 said:

I am a huge Battlefield fan since 1942 and have owned all of them. I thought 3 was a giant disappointment. 2, 2142, and BC2 were far superior games.  4 does look pretty cool, but I think it will be the first one I havn't pre-rdered in a long time, after getting burned on 3's mediocrity.

Why is it mediocre? A lot o people say that anout BF3 but I'm not sure why.

Can you list your main criticisms?


While it was surely by no means a terrible game, here are my honest opinions on it:

The bad: Huge balance issues, mediocre maps, exploits, super ugly Blue hue over the whole screen, input lag for some folks and not others, constant various score stats going nonstop on the center of screen, Terrible singleplayer, far less destruction than the previous game, medpacks for assault class, horrible server side management of latency caused by out of region players (which has never been an issue in any other BF game), tons of people intentionally joining game modes to try and ruin it for others in various ways which constantly makes the teams uneven.  The good: graphics, capture the flag, some cool weapons, good animations, prob best machineguns ever in BF game, pretty cool motion blur effects in certain sequences, jets were pretty well done

Most major issue by far was the maps.  They simply were not as good as multiple other games in the series...I greatly hope 4 addresses this, and from the videos so far it seems it may.