By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
superchunk on 27 August 2013
Edit Thread
ninjablade said:


read thew artice, worse frame rate, worse textues and load times make it the worst version, and its really time to change your comparison chart, your using the 320 sp count count from the neogaf gpu thread, it seems everybody there has excepted that its a 160 sp gpu, yet you continue to use old info to make your console of choice look better, even though its false infromation.

Just finished reading the full article.

The pop-in is not missing items... its simply full depth of an item. Its also far less worse than rampant screen tearing in the other versions.

Textures are not categorically worse. They are related to the pop-in issue and once the full item is there, it always looks better on Wii U which is why ALL screenshots look better on Wii U.

Then you have framerate, yes 20-25 is worse than 25-30 of the other two. However, I'd have to play it in motion to see if its an mere annoyance or a real issue.

You also can't forget that:
1) Wii U is putting it out in actual HD 720p while the other two are sub-HD to different degrees.
2) Wii U is also putting it out to an additional screen that the others don't have bogging them down.
3) Wii U doesn't have the mandatory install that would remove the pop-in issue and likely fix the load times too.
4) Wii U has a arguably best in class control option with the gamepad. (off-tv or 2nd screen option)

Finally, their summary clearly show they would actually prefer the Wii U version had it not been an obvious rush port and/or receives a patch to fix the FPS issue.

I think some of you haters are reading way too much into some details and cherry-picking/ignoring the other parts of the discussion.