By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 said:
fighter said:
sc94597 said:

 

Anarchism and Classical-Liberalism encompass what is "libertarian."  Liberal-conservatism (what is found in the United States) and Traditional Conservativism encompass "conservative. 

I hope that answers the thread quite well. 

While mostof it looks ok the "Change" section is messed up.

Populism is as much a part of fascim than it is of communist socialism.

Also, most socialisms across the world are social-liberal 

 

Where did you get that crap ?

Populism is a political doctrine where one sides with "the people" against "the elites".While for much of the twentieth century, populism was considered to be a political phenomenon mostly of Latin America and India, since the 1980s populist movements and parties have enjoyed degrees of success in First World democracies such as Canada, Italy, the Netherlands, and Scandinavian countries

Sounds like a plead for change to me. Nationalists are more traditional, and fascists are in between. As for socialism vs. social liberalism, the difference is whether the collective is more important than the individual or vice-verse. 

Not when the elites are in charge of Change, duh

 

Obvious answer is obvious.