richardhutnik said:
F. Perspective on what is evil, and things that are problems are. Like, I think it is a pretty close to terrible thing I have to tolerate another individual rehashing Ricky Gervais rehasing underdeveloped theological thoughts. Individuals like him are like individuals who think they outgrew Santa, know better, and just can't let others live with their belief in Santa. Because, when they lost their belief in Santa, they feel they are missing something, and long for greateness. If they, somehow, just can find the magic bullet, they will be famous. They will the tbe Wyld Stallyns of this world, and society will build a shrine to their wisdom. So, maybe I can go with Chesterton on this one and say that, if it wasn't for God, there wouldn't be atheists like Gervaris. They are individuals that live to be attention whores, because being on the top of the mind of people gets them work Free will can answer a number of things, but doesn't answer all. And it is uncertain even if Free Will exists. But, I say it can count for some though. Like, the bulk of First World Problems:
God's fault? I am sure they could be others to, as for the nature of evil, which is useful to discuss in general. But for me to spend time on it with an individual who merely has an axe to grind, and axe grinding is part of their ability to get fame? Sorry, not feeding that. |
So you call the arguments used by Ricky Gervais underdeveloped but then call all athiest who seek to provide arguments against the existence of god are attention whores and not just people seeking to eliminate a commonly held false belief. You then follow this up with the notion that athiest only exist because there is a god without explaining how that makes sense in any way, which is akin to saying if you have to prove something wrong it must be right.
All you have done is slander athiest rather than just deal with the arguments they have presented.
This is the Game of Thrones
Where you either win
or you DIE