Pemalite said:
disolitude said:
I don't think there was any doubt this was going to happen.
However if they put 6 GB of RAM on it (3 GB per GPU) its a big misfire... A card like that will need more VRAM to be utilized properly. There is no point getting this if you're gaming @1080p and at Nvidia surround/4k resolutions, some games are pushing close to 3 GB already.
In my opinion, the most "futureproof" GPU from Nvidia right now (not counting the Titan which is the king but too expensive) is the gtx 770 4GB version. 2 of those in SLI and you are well under 1000 dollars spent and have plenty of VRAM to run Nvidia surround for years to come. |
Nah. Need more than 6Gb of video memory. I'll happily walk away with 8-12Gb per card at my resolution.
I have already hit the 3Gb of video memory limit in most games, thus the GPU has to request and write the data from/to System Ram once the GDDR5 is filled, which by comparison is slow (Even though it's Quad Channel.)
Thus, performance tanks, generally I already have to sacrifice texture resolution to sit under the 3Gb barrier, just nothing available yet that's *really* worth me sinking down a couple grand.
|
Yep...exactly my thoughts. Need more than 3GB per GPU.
Knowing Nvidia and GTX 590, 690...they will not give us more than 6GB for 790.
