Dunban67 on 23 August 2013
I m generally against Paying for exclusivity - but subsidizing a game so that it can get made and/or subsiding a game so that t will come to your platform is just good business- Nintendo should have been/be doing it for key 3rd party multli plat games that are/have bypassed the Wii U - If a console owner subsidizes a game so that t can be made- then of course they have the mandate to make it exclusive- I m sure Nintendo could have kept Rayman an exclusive and/or maintained the Spring 2013 release of the Wii U if they have guaranteed a min # of sales- But Nintendo has not believed in the Wi U enough to do that so far
