I LOVE GIGGS said:
I don't know about these stuff and I don't care. The phones at launch time looked very good and were as good, from hardware standpoint, as their competitors. Lumia 925 is just another version of the 920 which launched in November. You can't compare it to a device that released six months later. Plus, from what I heared, Windows Phone does not require as much specs as Android. Better specs won't give a lot of difference. |
It does when it comes to benchmarks, Productivity, Multitasking and etc... btw look at the release date... both of those phones launched about the same time...
But heck... look at this one... I think its the same one from the ad
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/compare/Samsung-Galaxy-S4,Nokia-Lumia-1020/phones/7597,7876
That one released on June 11th I believe and it is still last gen hardware... And the most easiest way to say it is... S4 is about 4 times faster than the Nokia 1020 (Google benchmarks on both and you will see what I mean)
I wouldn't mind Nokia if they werent charging the same price for it as a phone that is more than double its speed... Yea android isn't as smooth as Windows Phone but Windows Phone also lack tons of features from android in the OS department. However the OS smoothness doesn't really affect the performance of the app itself
PC Specs: CPU: 7800X3D || GPU: Strix 4090 || RAM: 32GB DDR5 6000 || Main SSD: WD 2TB SN850