Not you per se, but your "people". All stereotypes are rooted in truth.....like how PS1 and PS2 made it big on that same criteria (most 3rd party). PS3 with 1st party with above criteria. XBLA released more in quantity and in critical acclaim for most of this generation......so theres more truth then you are willing to acknowledge.
Why do PS gamers systematically refuse to embrace their peoples history.....wheres the honor, why renounce???? But joking aside, it is part of your peoples culture.....not you I guess. And again, whos to say most of those games will stay exclusive on PS?
"Your people?"
In all seriousness. Stop doing that. I'm not one of these "people" you refer to. I like games I play games, it just happens that the kind of games I play are more often than not on a playstation system, I also play on Steam and dare I say the 360 and once in a while a DS and Wii. So whatever you are trying to do
stop it right now.
"But these games are all games that can be played on 360 and PS3. You aren't the least bit disapointed that there was no big hitter reveal? And whos to say these are all indie exclusives?"
Id like you to answer that.
But if all else, your origional comment that indie games don't count.....I don't care where your allegiances lie, just know it is PS gamers as a collective who said that for several years. I can't stress that enough, so please get your story straight.
