Wright said:
|
Did you mean "You're not serious, are you?" ?
Anyways...im quite series. You do realise that "indie" simply refers to games that are developed and released by independant developers?
In fact that makes some of the games Sony announced today not indie at all. Now if people didnt like some of the games because of the game itself then thats fine. But it seems like people are just annoyed because the games didnt seem like big budget AAA titles.
There are so many "indie" games that are really popular and people don't even know they are "indie".
Edit: Just to clarify my point: AAA titles don't necessarily turn out to be good games. The same applies to Independantly released games. A good example of this is Diablo 3. Diablo 3 is pretty much unanimously considered a massive failure by the majority of diablo players.Yet it was insanely hyped and had a very high budget --> "AAA"!!! Then comes along a little game made by something like 5 people? called path of exile which absolutely blows diablo 3 out of the water. Now im sure theres other diablo type clones that are pretty crap made by indie devs and/or other well knows pubs. But really thats not the point. A game can be good either way. And I'm literally shocked at some of the responses by people here. Because some of the games sony showed today looked good. Indie, not indie, AAA, AA , A or whatever the games looked good. Some looked like shit too. Some were old as fuck. Do you get my point?
