Personally I think the scoring or rating system is fine but silly fanboys keep throwing spanners at it. Saying that I believe some developers "buy" good reviews no matter how much the critics deny this. The world in general ( more so where money is concerned ) is crooked and dishonest so why should reviewers be any different.
If a 50-60 score is average then a game with a 70s rating is well above average. But these days less than 90 seem to represent a poor game. Sad.
Just to add, the way I see it the best reviewers are found on sites such as this one. Obviously you have to wait for the game to be released and you can't take just take anyone's bias review, but for the systems I have there are a few members that give really good opinions or reviews on new launch titles.
Existing User Log In
New User Registration
Register for a free account to gain full access to the VGChartz Network and join our thriving community.
