zorg1000 said:
Einsam_Delphin said:
zorg1000 said:
Yes ur right, if u dont want to do any of the optional features or side quests then u dont have to but if the developers put too much time into those things which ends up hindering the main quest then the game becomes worse despite having more content.
Also theres more to it than just "dont use that pokemon". If they add 100 new pokemon and the majority of them have horrible designs based off of lame inanimate objects, there is no way around it, that makes the game worse. Also just because u dont personally use those pokemon in battle doesnt mean u wont encouter them repeatedly in the wild or from other trainers.
|
That's true, but in the case of Pokemon that has never been an issue for any game in the series, likely because of the core structure being so simple.
Whether or not a Pokemon sucks appearance wise is personal opinion, not fact. X person could like Y Pokemon while Z person hate's it, so you can't use that when determining whether or not the game is the best. Also, you should like encountering the Pokemon you don't like as it means you can give em the smackdown! |
All im saying is adding new features/characters doesnt automatically make a game better, which is what u told Boutros. X/Y certainly have potential to be better than previous installments but potential doesnt mean shit if its not executed properly. There is no way someone can say a game is better than another game if one of them isnt even out yet. |
Well there must be a way since that's exactly what I'm saying lol! We all know the core gameplay of Pokemon, and we all know that it's not ever gonna change, well atleast not with X/Y. If you've played any previous Pokemom game, then by default you know how X/Y will play. So yes it's very easy to say it whether or not it will be the best in the series without actually playing it yet. Same thing with MK8 and how I'm saying it will be the best in it's series aswell.
