So an Abortion limiting bill passed in my state, Texas

[Mr Khan]

Cubedramirez said:
Protect Women's access to healthcare.

So, unless abortion clinics are available women won't get medical care? Are they hoping for people to have the intelligence of grade schoolers or what? And since I am bringing up terminology, how in the hell does the act of using a vacuum to tear apart the child, or scrapping apart the child, or that whole saline poisoning thing where the skin literally dissolves off the child get to be wrapped up in the same category of breast exams and pap smears?

Wait, I think they are going through yet another renaming to try and confuse the general public. They're going by the name of, "Choice providers", so they can take away the stigma abortion has from the conversation. I always felt if you couldn't be fully upfront and honest about something, then maybe you're on the wrong side of the issue.

At least Texas is moving in the right direction.

If you're not being fully upfront and honest, like the shady legislative tactics that the Texas Republicans had to employ to try to pass this (including lying about the time-stamp on the bill to make its passage valid).

It's all in the same category because it all has to do with women's health. It's her body. And these are often low-cost clinics that do a lot of outreach work. How in the world can we make a straightfaced argument for a reduction in availability of health care?