BinaryDelt said:
Just responding to your statement about consumers buying things regardless of their principles. I disagree. There are a lot of things I don't buy due to principle, regardless of whether I want it or not. |
I never understand why people respond to this argument with personal anecdotes.
You're aware of the atrocities at Foxconn, who supply apple products? Has it damaged sales in any way?
You may be someone who does stand on principle. This is not the norm. You're in the extreme minority.
sales2099 said:
Like I said, they will have to chose between principle and games....and games will win out. But by no means will the transition be like the snap of a finger. That was my point. Your 360 line is a bit confusing, because I allready said that a Xbox gamer is used to the idea, but to a PS gamer the idea is still in the process of being embraced. Its less hypocrisy and more of a cultural difference between Xbox and PS gamers, IMO. |
It will be a snap. With PS360 there was an option to buy a console that didn't charge.
The option isn't there anymore. Or, it's at least less prevalent. (Wii U)
I'm not sure how you missed my point, but I'll repeat it. When you went to purchase a 360, did you or did you not realize that multiplayer gaming would be charged? It's not some big secret and it didn't seem to stop many from making the purchase. Same scenario here with PS4, but to a lesser extent because their competition is doing the same thing.







