PSP and PS3 games - are they really that bad?

[davygee]

Gballzack said:

Look at the list of sites Metacritic uses... They're all pro-Sony. Seriously, just look at the list. I've seen this exact same argument used before on other forums and each and every time its been called out on the basis that it uses Metacritic as a source. Face it, the closest thing you're going to ever get to an objective source is the game sales.

An honestly if the Quality over Quantity argument didn't work for the N64 and GC, why do you think its going to work for the PS3 and PSP?

Shame on you Davygee, shame on you, you should have known better than to try something like this.

Oh come on.  You can't help yourself but try and knock it down time after time.  All pro-Sony then (GameSpy, GameZone, IGN, Yahoo! Games, PocketGamer, GameSpot, Games Master, 1UP, Games Radar, Total Video Games, Euro Gamer, EGM).  Sales cannot be used as the best source for good games...look at Spiderman 3...also the DS and Wii will have more hardware sales than the PSP and PS3.

I think you will find that quality of game gauged by finding the average of all reviews if the best way.  Also even pro-Sony reviewers won't necessarily rate a game better anyway.  It's all down to experience....yes some do, but not all and not the majority.

The bottom line is that there is a larger selection of better rated games on both the PSP and PS3 than the DS or Wii.