happydolphin said:
You're usually so smart. Did you read the thread? |
I didn't read the whole thing, because I saw how the debate was going, and felt that, if someone had made a relevant point that mattered, I'd have seen a comment about it on skimming.
I went back and read all of your posts, particularly (at least, all of them up to a point), and I saw nothing that challenges what I said. You dismiss logic - you can use fancy phrases like "pre-supposed logic", but it comes down to exactly the same problem.
Let me address a specific point that you made - if god can have foreknowledge of an event happening, then that even must necessarily have been pre-determined. Otherwise, it would be possible for the event to not occur, and thus the foreknowledge to be wrong. So you have four choices if we assume that god exists:
1. There is no such thing as foreknowledge. (no omniscience)
2. Everything is predetermined. (no free will)
3. God gets it wrong sometimes. (no infallibility)
4. God intentionally ignores his own foreknowledge (willful ignorance)
Personally, if I were a religious person, I wouldn't like any of those possibilities.







