Zekkyou on 11 August 2013
| artur-fernand said: Aaaah, people are already pretending they didn't understand my point. It's not a matter of "pokemon doesn't release every year" or "Ruby/Sapphire is different from X/Y" Red and Blue are the same game. Gold and Silver are the same game. Ruby and Sapphire are the same game, and so on. They release on the same game. People buy both of them and are perfectly fine with it. But to buy Modern Warfare today and Black Ops one year later is a terrible, terrible thing, as you're supporting copy-and-paste game development. But it's Nintendo. They can do it with all of their franchises.. They're innovators after all. |
I'd say very few people actually buy both (I certainly never have). Two versions of each game are released to encourage players trading and playing against those with the other game, which is exactly what it did.
Call of Duty is supposed to be a brand new game with each literation, but its additions never merit the £45 entry fee. The two versions of each pokemon game are never marketed as being different games; they just come with slightly different content for you to choose based on preference.]
I really don't get the point in the third game though. I suppose it's for people who don't like playing with others :p
