By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
J_Allard on 09 August 2013
Edit Thread
RenCutypoison said:
J_Allard said:
iceland said:
Why does Sony get credit for 3rd party games that are only exclusive because it isn't financially viable to port over to the 360? Tales of Xillia, Ni no kuni, Disgaea, etc. have nothing to do with Sony supporting their console. Not attacking anyone I just never understood that.

Another thing I don't understand is how do people not count XBLA titles, like really? A game is a game to be, why shouldn't we count them? MS has been all about XBLA, if you exclude them you're only doing a disservice to yourself.

Anyways I think it'll be interesting to see how both companies support their systems in the upcoming years.

Bolded: it helps some posters with their agenda.

The XBLA part is the saddest/funniest part. There is so much incredible content on there. Hell, my most played SP title of the last few years is State of Decay but according to most of the huge Xbox 360 enthusiasts in this thread, it's not really a real game. Saint Seiya and Mugen Souls though.. those are real games.


Well, State of decay was compared to the last of us on launch, and it did not benefit from that.

I played 350 hours on Mugen Souls, it was fun, it's just not for everyone. 

And most good games on XBLA goes multiplat after 6 months.

State of Decay did just fine. 2nd fastest selling game of all time on XBLA IIRC.

And no, most good XBLA games do not go multiplat after 6 months.

The Mugen Souls comment was sarcastic. In these list wars people downplay incredible XBLA games but trump up obscure/irrelevant Japanese titles.