happydolphin said:
If he is unbound by time, and was there when it happened (so he knows), it's not because he pre-established the outcome, but because it already happened. |
Not a very solid foundation you're on. You're basically saying since he has one option to view decisions in a non-temporal manner, that negates his ability to view them in one. An omniscient being would view them in every manner; as such, the temporal view is certainly subject to the same logical statements I've presented.
Simple example:
Milk or OJ <-- your illusion of choice, the ominscient being already knows you've chosen one of them. You cannot choose a different one than is already known.
