Mr Khan said:
Screamapillar said:
Mr Khan said:
The 20 weeks thing is neither here nor there. What it affects is in these onerous requirements shutting down clinics that a lot of women use for a broad array of health services.
It so often seems like prenatal life is the only life the pro-lifers give a damn about, given their opposition to funding for any health services for the living. |
Is it right for us to be taxed to pay for others' health services? I would say it is not.
I wouldn't even be opposed to states running these so-called health clinics. Although we know that they are by and large abortion clinics. I just don't think the federal government has any business getting involved and taking care of people in this way.
If we as a society decide that we want state-run health clinics, then so be it (even though I personally don't see why I should be taxed to pay for it if I or my family doesn't use it), but it should be done on a state level, not on a federal level. Let the states deal with their health services as they choose, and let the pro-life states limit abortion services, and the free-wheeling liberal states have as many abortions as they want.
|
Abortion is only a tiny part of what these health clinics offer. The Planned Parenthood organization, for instance, has only a miniscule fraction of their budget alloted to abortion services.
These are "women's health" clinics, first and foremost, which is why i have a hard time believing that Texas is doing anything but deliberately stomping further on women and the poor.
|
thats patently false. over 10% of the patients the have get abortions. thats not "miniscule" when you make $100 million a year by killing babies thats not "miniscule".
that outragous and disgusting.
its unconsciencable.
