thranx said:
On the other hand a child still in the womb of it mother has not had the chance to make the wrong choices that may lead to a bad life. Rather it has had it decisons made ofr it. So it doesn't bear responisibilty for what it has not done. Instead a mother, may at will cease its life for now reason at all. Now what confuses me is how people can say that women should be able to kill their babies because it is their bodies, but than think that the baby has no say in its treatment of its body. Where is the logic in that? Shouldn't the baby also be able to decide what happens with its body, and if its not shouldn't those decisions be made by someone who has the babies best interest at heart? I always have trouble understanding that logic, and reasoning. |
For at least half of the pregnancy, the fetus (it's not a baby until it's born) wouldn't survive being born as it isn't developed enough to survive on it's own, so up until that point, it's up to the women who has to give birth to it. Which i guess is 5 or 6 months now (enough time to think about it by then). And how do we know what the fetus wants? it can only do basic communication like smiling and kicking.
But my main problem with banning abortion is that it won't prevent abortion, making it illegal would just force it underground and could be a great way for gangs to make money alongside other activities they do, pushing up crime rates.
Xbox One, PS4 and Switch (+ Many Retro Consoles)
'When the people are being beaten with a stick, they are not much happier if it is called the people's stick'- Mikhail Bakunin
Prediction: Switch will sell better than Wii U Lifetime Sales by Jan 1st 2018