| ListerOfSmeg said: 1. It still had it and if I am not mistaken any HDSD card could be used for expanded memory. 2. That's just silly. I am sorry but do you blame MS or Sony for a bad Activision game? Probably not because that wouldnt make sense and it doesnt make snese here other than to justify your stance against them. " Look at this generation's top multi-platform games - Wii versions were either hack-jobs, or non-existent entirely" and again I fail to see how that is Nintendos fault. They didnt program the games. We had Elder scrolls on Xbox so no reason one couldnt have worked on Wii. You get out of something what you put into it and that is exactly what most 3rd parties got. 3. I will say it again since you ignored it the first time but having the highest rated exclusive this gen proves the hardware was more than capable. |
1. You're still relying on an additional product to add on hard drive space. That isn't a very good idea - its like Kinect, or any additional piece to a console... Not everyone will get it, and you're fragmenting the user base. And it still doesn't change Nintendo's horrific size policy.
2. I would if Sony or Microsoft botched something up with their relationship with Activision. Publishers are out there to make as much money and sell to as many people as possible. They will do any and everything they can to make a profit. So if a console proves to be a poor value proposition, they won't release titles that they spend tens of millions of dollars on. And this is why we saw the Wii have very few AAA titles released alongside the X360/PS3.
3. Go look up the top 10 titles for all this-gen titles. The worst X360 game is a 93.89%, PS3 is 93.64%, while the Wii is at 91.33%. The X360/PS3 library is quantitatively and qualitatively superior. Yes, the Wii has a few grand titles - but the other consoles, have far, far more.
Back from the dead, I'm afraid.
