pokoko on 06 August 2013
You know, the more I think about this, the more puzzled I am by what the author is trying to say. When it comes to fossilization, 70 million years or 4.5 thousand years wouldn't make a difference. The point is that the skin fossilized very quickly, the time after that is immaterial. I know he's trying to spin this around so he can use it to push his own agenda but I cannot figure out the angle at all. There isn't even a shred of logic in his argument. Maybe he thinks the members of his intended audience aren't really the brightest candles at the altar?
