| Mr Khan said: Value produced, as you said. The value produced by these employees is higher than it was in the past, never mind that they are not personally responsible for the higher productivity. If they produce more value, they are worth more. |
They’re nuances to running a business. An owner has to weigh the cost benefit ratio on every single move they make because so many people are invested in their success. Employees, customers, suppliers and the local community; that’s on top of the person who forked over the three hundred plus thousands of un-borrowed personal capital just to get the store open. Your premise is built upon there being a vacuum of cost and risk associated with business unchanged from the 1950’s. No difference in market competition, supply of able labor and general cost of operation. There is no headway or productive outcome to this anymore with someone so dense.
I could go into the path of a labor cost increase of over two hundred percent and how a company could attempt to adjust personal needs as well as price increases, but from your answers and responses you’re either being intellectually dishonest to promote ‘fairness’, you are actually someone who quite honestly has no understanding of the most basic lemonade stand economics or you’re just trying to get me quite ‘Butt Hurt’ over this whole discussion.
Either way, it is quite boring now.
User was warned for this post.
yo_john117
