| happydolphin said: @bold. That's your choice, but if you're going to go with majority, just remember that majority was with the church in Galileo's day. Just sayin', majority was wrong. @Peer review. That's simply untrue -> http://creation.com/creationism-science-and-peer-review @Validation of theories. That's wrong, they posit theories to support the biblical claims, and often disagree with each other within the creationist community. @Pseudoscience. What YOU'RE doing is pseudoscience, excuse me. You're just repeating words from the anti-creationist community and I hear the same words over and over again, they are just meaningless drivel (no joke). This is not to offend you, I just proved a few claims by you and MDMAlliance false already, there is likely much more. So to answer your last paragraph, I trust them a lot because they actually do science rather than pretend to in order to fit with the concensus. There are good scientists on both sides, but imho the onus is on creationists to prove their worth and so I have seen what they do and trust it more as a true quest for scientific truth than the other way around (so far). It's my opinion. If I were to choose someone to tell me the truth, I'd choose the creationist. |
Keyword is scientist. Galileo was a scientist- an astronomer-those who opposed him and turned out to be were wrong was the Catholic Church.
I completely respect whatever you choose to believe in, but I don't like the idea of confusing science and belief.
