keroncoward said:
|
That's exactly the point. The Person who attacks first is at fault... that's exactly how the law should be.
If Zimmerman committed a crime there is zero proof he did.
Actually, even then he didn't comit manslaughter.
http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2013/07/11/the-manslaughter-option-in-zimmermans-trial-an-explainer/
Reckless Endangerment, maybe?
By the way, since it seems like your only working on about half the facts, (Like everybody in this thread).
"They always get away" was a refrence to the recent string of robberies in the area... being committed by young adults who just happened to rob places in Black Hoodies. Or at least that's what the Justice Depeartment Inquiry seems to show. So even the racial profiling seems out the window.
Though yeah... I imagine if I were looking to jump so guy who was following me... I would wait until AFTER he hung up his phone. Since otherwise i'd have the police on me pretty fast. Even if such a situation is 5% likely you can't convict.
What happened? Who knows. Anyone who thinks George Zimmerman should of been found guilty though just wasn't paying attention and letting emotion get in the way of fact... and I don't know what's up with people who think Trayvon is definitly guilty.
Though, if the evidence were reversed. Trayvon following Zimmerman, and Zimmerman beat trayvon to death. There is a much better chance he would of been convicted of manslaughter.








