Max King of the Wild said:
keroncoward said:
DD_Bwest said:
keroncoward said:
DD_Bwest said:
how can you call a goverment attorney low budget? It was a special prosecuter brought in specifically for this, and they spent loads of time effort to keep lots of facts about martin out of the trial.. and it wasnt that he was unprepared, it was that it was a crappy witness who not matter what you asked would have helped the defense. Plus they have to keep the questions in line with what is admissable in court.
|
They were screwed from the start. The police never even charged Zimmerman. You think they would even co operate properly with the prosecutor and admit they were not doing their job properly? We all heard the 911 tapes with him disobeying the dispatcher's instructions to stay put then whispering to himself "they always get away". There was enough evidence to charge him with manslaughter (heck a kid got stalked and died).
|
wow you need to go back and look at how the evidence in the trial got handled. Zimmermans defense didnt get vast portions of it until just before the trial, and had to send requests over and over for it. The entire way they got the run around and the judge allowed character information about zimmerman, but said anything about TM was off limits. He was getting off via appeal no matter what for how bias the judge was. There was no evidence at all that shows zimmerman starting the altercation. The 911 operator didnt say stay in,they said "we dont need you to" as he was already out of the damn car. and by "they always get away" was the string of burglaries that no one was caught for. The cops never charged him because when they arrived on scene they used their experience and training to determine it was self defense.
lets go through step by step, TM walks home from the store. Not a crime. GZ sees him and thinks is suspicious so calls police. Not a crime. GZ gets out of the car to give police more information. Not a crime. TM attacks GZ and smashes his skull into a concrete side walk. This is aggravated assualt. GZ shoots TM. Thats called self defense.
TM wasnt some young kid, he was an aging teenager. and When i was an aging teenager, i know i hell of alot of kids at school who would attack someone older. The was taller then GZ and in better shape, and had bragged about being a good fighter. GZ's personal trainer called GZ a little bitch
|
So TM starts the altercation? Lmao this is hilarious. How the hell is someone bragging about something not related to the incident evidence? How come GZ violent past is not used as evidence? Who the hell cares who was bigger or was in better shape? How is that concrete evidence that Trayvon started the altercation? Also someone can claim self defense and still get manslaughter (which this clearly was).
|
Yes, all evidnece points to TM starting it and GZ ending it. Bragging about wanting a rematch with someone because "they didn't bleed enough" just is background to what type of person TM was. It clearly shows the more likely scenario is he started the fight. And by GZ violent past? LOL you mean when a plain clothed officer harrassed his buddy without identifying himself as an officer and GZ pushed him away from his friend? Thats called loyalty. Someone Id like to be in my corner. You know the guy who pulls a family from an overturned vehicle. The kind of guy who gets charges against a police officer for abusing a homeless black male. The guy who mentors low income families. Not some drug abusing thug who steals jewlry and starts fights
|
There was no evidence.....all there was is GZ statements about what happened. The other guy could not give statements because he was shot dead in the grass. Reguardless of who started it (which was most likely the stalker with the gun) its manslaughter. Also i would still like to know the lies and misinformation i was spreading. If i was misinformed i have no problem admitting it.
