Zappykins said:
MM, Ok, well no point in trying to convince you then. I'll just leave these for others reading it. "Intel has already launched a line of its Atom mobile chips that are tweaked to work as low-power server chips." (from the article in the previous post)
*This was project, in reality Haswell hit much more efficient project, see previous article where it was 6.5W which is better than the 13W they expected. |
Both 6.5W and 13W bear no resemblance to actual power consumption. No matter how many times you bold "LOW POWER".
If you'd like I can get an actual chip engineer to come and explain this to you.
In the server configuration, neither part is actually competitive on performance/watt versus ARM. So it does not represent an advance. And as I said they crippled performance to get it down that low in power.
And anyway this thread is talking about DESKTOP performance, right? That's what we care about? And that's what I'm claiming no advances since 2012 for.
