Michael-5 said:
Now I think you're being ignorant, every single game you mentioned is average or even below average, nothing special at all, nothing in comparision to the 90+ rated games on PSP. Even Uncharted, compred to the console games it's meh from what I played, and it's metascore is only 80, where Uncharted's typically score above 90, even above 95. I've played a bit of Vita at the Gamestop and was not impressed. Also you don't need to play most of the games you mentioned, Luminies is similar to the PSP version - nothing special, Soul Sacrifice is a lot like Monster Hunter - average, and watch any review and you'll see that many reviers will state that Uncharted on Vita is not as good as on PS3, but still good. You only need to play Assassin's Creed for Vita for a couple minutes to see how acurate reviews are. No educated opinion? This is why people watch reviews, and if reviewers give PSV games meh scores, and say they are meh, or not as good as PS3 versions, then that's what they are. Also no, PS1 games look amazing on a large LCD, that's how I play them. Nothing I said was incorrect, you just can't accept. |
Ignorance? LOL No it's counting, PSV doesn't even have a single exclusive JRPG.. and it's biggest original games are washed down PS3 franchises. PSP had Crisis Core, Jeanne D'Ark, The 3rd Birthday etc. It didn't rely on Grand Theft Auto and God of War, like PSV relies on Uncharted and Killzone.
1. Dude. Seriously, answer one simple question. You said "the lineup is ALL ports or downgraded PS3 games". Is this sentence factualy correct yes or not?
2. "7 games with an average score in the 70's is a lot?" Where did I say a lot? I only mentioned those 7 games to show you that your statement was factually incorrect, which it was, as they are NEITHER ports NOR downgraded ps3 games. I'm buying a 3ds just for pokemon. A single game can be enough for some people to buy a console. The psvita has more than 7 games; those were simply examples of neither ports or downgraded ps3 games. It has tons of other games which are multiplats and as multiplats, they can be played on a psvita.
3. "I've played a bit of Vita at the Gamestop and was not impressed" : You think that's enough to form an educated opinion?
4. "Soul Sacrifice is a lot like Monster Hunter - average" How would you know if you haven't played the damn game? I've spent more than 70 hours playing it.
5. " if reviewers give PSV games meh scores, and say they are meh, or not as good as PS3 versions, then that's what they are." : It doesn't work that way. That's why you see tons of posts by members of this community arguing that metacritic is flawed and that a review is nothing more than a gamer's opinion. Instead one should read the review and not rely on the score. A (or many) bad review does not make a game bad, not enjoyable or not worth buying a system for. People disagree with reviews and reviewers all the time.
6. "Also what does it matter if the PSV has a average rated JRPG in Japan with no plans to localize? I don't read Japanese. At this moment PSV doesn't even have a single JRPG exclusive, don't ignore that and call me ignorant." Because you should have stated that there is not a single exclusive jrpg on psvita in the West. Instead, what you said was "No it's counting, PSV doesn't even have a single exclusive JRPG." Phrase your sentences better.
7. "Also no, PS1 games look amazing on a large LCD, that's how I play them." Debatable. We can make a poll and see what people think who have a psvita. Large LCDs make the pixels look terrible. In a smaller screen the games look much better in my opinion. But like I said, if you're feeling confident, let's make a bet and let vgchartz users decide.
If you don't see that my first point shows that your statement was factually incorrect, please feel free not to respond and waste the time of either one of us.
Also, please tell me which sentence of mine si factually incorrect and suggests that I'm ignorant.
