By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
MDMAlliance said:
kupomogli said:
Azzanation said:

3DS is cheaper and there library is alot bigger with better quality games. If Vita was cheaper im sure people will consider it but it will hurt Sony more as there not in any shape to lower costs.

I'd disagree.  The 3DS and Vita both have good games, but the Vita has more games that are good.  The problem with the Vita is that it shares most of the games with the PS3.  Opinion only, but if you were to compare like titles between 3DS and Vita, the Vita games have been much better quality whether it's graphics or gameplay.


Purely subjective and most gamers would disagree with that assessment. 


Well, for some more objective data...

Looking at retail games only the Vita has 16 games to score above an 80% average critic score.  Of the 16, 5 are exclusive to the Vita. 1 scored above 90% (Persona 4) and is not exclusive.  The 3DS has 22 games to score 80% or above.  Of those, 12 are exclusive to the 3DS.  One game (Re: Revelations) was a timed exclusive for 3DS.  3 games scored above a 90%.  Two of them (Fire Emblem Awakening, Super Mario 3D Land) were exclusives, and one (Ocarina of Time 3D) was non-exclusive. 

Some people are going to be all like "blah blah media is biased blah blah".  To those people, I say if you have a better objective source of information, let me know :)