RolStoppable said:
DarkTemplar said:
Thanks, Rol.
I appreciate very much your help.
The opinions showed to you are randomly selected from our database. What is shown to you are the opinions (the highlighted text) what comes before and after it. What probably happened is that the games you choosed did not have many opinions this is because the highlighted part of the text sometimes apears before or after other opinions.
We used an opinion classifier to ensure that most of the text displayed during the experiment are in fact opinions, however since there no way to create a perfect opinion classifier we also offer the opinion to the volunteers replace a sentence he thinks that is an opinions by another one from our database.
Finally, "incoherent" texts are expected the be in our database and it is important to volunteers to judge as well because our I.A. algorhitms can learn what people like you think is "incoherent".
|
One thing I wonder about is how you will judge what it was that made any given opinion relevant to me.
|
That is essentialy what my PhD is.
We developed many ways to find it out.
For instance, one of the heuristics we use to know if an opinion is relevant or not to you is based on the similarity between you and the author of the opinion.
With this experiment we aim to gather enough data so we can learn (using A.I. algorithms) how important each of the heuristics we created is.
