My one issue with the "exclusives" argument

[Eddie_Raja]

sales2099 said:

Who says gamers are logical?Every faction behaves illogically.Doesn't explain the sales of Minecraft for 360 or Left4 Dead 1/2. Millions just consciously make the choice to not game on their PCs.....crazy I know. No preference is universal and lists should be unbiased and impartial. Putting PC into it is biased....and not impartial at all.

Is it fear that we filter these lists? So what if X1 may or may not have more offerings not on PS4 for 2013.....you will just claim that you can play some of the X1 games on PC right? So what do you care if someone chooses to make a strict 1 vs 1 comparison and limit the criteria to just their games?

And cmon.....weve been living in a XBox vs PS rivalry for over a decade. Can we not act like it ISN'T 1 vs 1? Because it has been then and it is exactly that now. So really, it comes to a earlier theory I have.......Xbox offers a better library then PS 1 vs 1. A PS3 gamer NEEDS a PC to be competitive with lonely old Xbox.....

By the way the above sentence is technically true...360 has more 70-90+ metacritic games.

LOL you just keep on going with this BS.  Here is a breakdown of the order of current gen consoles my friends and I have bought in the order they bought them:

A: PS3

B: PS3

C: PS3

D: 360,PS3

E: Wii,360,PS3

F: 360,PS3

G: 360

H:360

I: 360,PS3

J: 360

So then think about it.  Nobody who started with a PS3 got anything else,  everyone (Only one in this example but you get the idea) who go a Wii got a 360 or PS3, and 4/7 people who got a 360 got a PS3 later.  It seems to me one console makes more people satisfied long term.  This is also backed up by the fact that the PS3 passed 360 in sales and continues to dominate them week by week.  A lot of people ran out of games to play on 360 and wanted something they couldn't get elseware...