BMaker11 said:
Only 25% of the time? The moral of that whole post was that even with a regularly priced laptop, meant for more than just word processing and browsing the internet, is capable of running a lot of games. Considering the specs of that laptop, you don't think the average person has that or a comparable laptop or PC? You're fooling yourself if you think otherwise. Given that, re-read what I said. If you're going to buy a 360 or PS3, and you're leaning towards the 360 because of games like Left 4 Dead or The Witcher, you realize "hey, the family computer back home can run those games, why would I buy a console for that?" and you realize the PS3 is a better choice, because you get those "exclusives not on PS3" and all the PS3 has to offer, instead of getting....what the PC already offers, just on a console. |
Yes about 25% of the time. I have already read your post, but I think its time you read a few posts back where someone posts information about cross platform gaming. And we came to the conclusion that about 1 in every 4 gamers has both a console and a PC capable of gaming on.
So yeah your scenario works for 1 out of every 4 gamers, but when creating the list you have to account for everyone, especially the majority and since the majority do not fit your scenario every game has to be listed that the other doesnt play.
Here is the information that was posted, and this was posted by someone making the same argument you are. 
