My one issue with the "exclusives" argument

[J_Allard]

dsgrue3 said:

J_Allard said:

Eddie_Raja said:

Minecraft runs fine on even the weaker intel integrated graphics, and it's only real requirement is having a decent amount of ram (More than 2 GB).  So do you not have a PC/Mac/Linux-Box?  Do you know anyone (Above the age of 12) who doesn't?

Gaming computer does not solely mean a computer with adequate hardware. For example my brother simply does not allow his kids to game on the computer. Thus, they have a computer, but they do not have a gaming computer. So yes, I know plenty of people who either don't have gaming computers, or don't like gaming on the computer in general. You're trying to tell us the market is very small and niche and yet again, 7,000,000+ sold. The demand is there.

He said people older than 12.

Read more carefully.

My brothers kids are 17, 13, and 6. I might be wrong, but I think 2 of those are higher than 12. Help my math out a little bit here, please.

Furthermore that was just one example. And it's being applied to a game that is not very demanding. What about Witcher 2? It takes a pretty good PC just to run that game moderately well. And these scenarios you guys are grasping on, only apply to people who do have PC's capable of gaming and do enjoy doing so on them. There are tons and tons of people who, as I said, either don't have a PC, or prefer not to game on a PC.

You can continue to stick your fingers in your ears and pretend as if the number is insignificant, logic and common sense tells the rest of us it's not. Otherwise Sony and MS would not bother getting these games.