| Playstationfan12 said: wow only 12 real exclusives in 3 years is just pathetic. This is why I wonder why people say 360 >ps3. Yah maybe casuals think this with all that Kinect crap. |
Some people might not be "casuals" and yet, simply not care for a ton of games on that PS3 side. For example out of all those non-Move PS3 titles, I bought 7. Was satisfied with 2 (GT5, Last of Us) of them. The rest were average titles or broken in some way and were quickly traded in/forgotten about.
Meanwhile the 360 side is over 3 times smaller yet I still managed to buy 6 of those titles and was satisfied with 3 (Gears, Forza 4/Horizon).
And then you still have XBLA, which imho blows PSN out of the water without breaking a sweat, and a majority of 3rd party titles running better on 360, not to mention DLC exclusive deals for other games that sway me to get the 360 version (CoD, Bethesda in general, etc). Plus you have titles also available on PC like Witcher 2. But guess what? I don't like gaming on my PC and my PC probably couldn't run Witcher 2 anywhere near as well as the 360. So for me, I count that. If you own a gaming PC, you wouldn't count that.
You don't have to agree with this line of thinking but you said you wonder why people can think this way, I provided you with an unbiased, perfectly logical reason.
