By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
dsgrue3 on 16 July 2013
Edit Thread
sales2099 said:
dsgrue3 said:

I like the underlined part, but it applies to you not to me. You're the one blind to the fact that if I already have a PC and I'm analyzing which console to get, I certainly don't care about titles already available to me. This is why one must exclude them from consideration. 

In other words, PS3 - PC, 360 - PC.

You're arguing from a position of no PC. That's fine, but it's abnormal and you should simply admit it.

What you make of a 360 vs PS3 list is of no concern to me. If you have a gaming PC, then by all means you can play the games that benefit Xbox and not PS.

Using your own princliples and assuming they are universal is abnormal. The comparison is unbiased in nature. What you make of them depends entirely on your preferences. But if god forbid, Xbox has more games then PS on a given year, due to multiplats not on PS, it shouldn't affect you and you shouldn't defend PS because you'd just play on you PC, right?

You seem concerned enough to reply about it. 

You don't need a gaming PC to play many of the titles available like Minecraft for instance. Again, my laptop from 2006 handled it appropriately. How many people do you know who don't own a PC? Of course it's abnormal not to own one. You're just being ridiculous at this point.

I don't care which platform has the most games; you seem to for whatever reason...

I care about games that interest me. I don't care which platform it's on, but I'm certainly not picking up an additional platform when I already own a viable one for playing these games.