My one issue with the "exclusives" argument

[sales2099]

dsgrue3 said:

sales2099 said:

dsgrue3 said:

Like Ethomaz tried to explain to you already, everyone (nearly) has a PC. 

Thus when forming a comparison of each respective console's list of games, one should exclude PC games because that isn't adding any value to the product unless you don't have a PC.

It isn't universal that we use them, nor it is that we choose the PC version.

But that is beside the point. This isn't about your personal vdieo game platforms of choice. If you compare one console vs another, you keep it restricted to those 2 consoles, nothing more. This includes everything from exclusives to mutliplats: whatever each one cna do what the other can't. Your gaming preferences outside these 2 have no place in such a comparison.

I like the underlined part, but it applies to you not to me. You're the one blind to the fact that if I already have a PC and I'm analyzing which console to get, I certainly don't care about titles already available to me. This is why one must exclude them from consideration. 

In other words, PS3 - PC, 360 - PC.

You're arguing from a position of no PC. That's fine, but it's abnormal and you should simply admit it.

What you make of a 360 vs PS3 list is of no concern to me. If you have a gaming PC, then by all means you can play the games that benefit Xbox and not PS.

Using your own princliples and assuming they are universal is abnormal. The comparison is unbiased in nature. What you make of them depends entirely on your preferences. But if god forbid, Xbox has more games then PS on a given year, due to multiplats not on PS, it shouldn't affect you and you shouldn't defend PS because you'd just play on you PC, right?