sales2099 said:
Most dont care about X vs Y........don't make me laugh. But theres the root problem: you are including your personal preferences into it when it actually has no place. Its a comparison of what one has and the other doesn't on a strict 1 vs 1 basis. What you make of the list is entirely up to you and the platforms you game on. But thats not the point. The point is seeing what each can do on a individual basis, completely unbiased and devoid of personal tastes. |
It's more of a logical reasoning.
If a game gets announced and at the end it has a XboxOne/PC tag. I go: Cool, might check it out on my PC.
If it only has a Xbox One tag, I go: Fuck.. might have to spend shit ton of money on a console now. Or I'll go defensive and write shit about a game because I won't experience it. There are those kinds of people in the world.
I want whatever purchase I do to justify itself to me. That is what Sony has been doing and why I consider myself a fan of them as well as their game developers.
What is even more funny is that you knock off games that would be from past generations too when still on a "1 VERSUS 1" basis, they ought to count. After all: The PS3 can play MGS1 and the 360 cant. Derp.
Honestly: I don't care. It's completely irrational to ignore so many other factors. I'll just go back to play Alan Wake without a 360.
I won't ever need one seeming as Microsoft has done absolutely nothing to give me any real reason to get one.
I even had two but I sold both :3 They dont fill a purpose in my living room and I won't ignore anything in it to justify the reason of its existance for me.