My one issue with the "exclusives" argument

[sales2099]

Aldro said:

sales2099 said:

If a thread says 360 vs PS3 vs PC....your more then welcome to include PC.

If a thread says 360 vs PS3....you stick to.....um.....360 and PS3.....because that is the criteria set out.....1 vs 1.

I am amazed how simple this can be yet so hard to grasp for some.

I think many of us don't give a shit about X VS Y

 

Say this scenario is true =>

Sales has a 360 only
Aldro has a PS3 & PC

 

TLOU is released on PS3:
I will be able to play it. You will not.

Minecraft is released on 360/PC:
I will be able to play it. You will too.

Aldro gets to play both games. Sales only gets to play one game.

Sales wants to compare PS3 to 360 alone but Aldro doesnt give a shit because he can play both games already therefore there is no competition in the first place. Aldro simply doesn't even need to do a VS because ultimately: He has 100% of the 360/PC titles available to him.

Most dont care about X vs Y........don't make me laugh. But theres the root problem: you are including your personal preferences into it when it actually has no place. Its a comparison of what one has and the other doesn't on a strict 1 vs 1 basis.

What you make of the list is entirely up to you and the platforms you game on. But thats not the point. The point is seeing what each can do on a individual basis, completely unbiased and devoid of personal tastes.