My one issue with the "exclusives" argument

[sales2099]

Euphoria14 said:

sales2099 said:

 

Actually I can. It ain't difficult. When I mention Alan Wake, or Left 4 Dead, I am referring to the Xbox version. A PS gamer would refer to the PC version, as a PS3 version does not exist.

Its 1 vs 1. But your right, it does work both ways. Count FF14, Sly Cooper, PS Battle Royale, MLB. All multiplats not on Xbox. Its progressive thinking I know, but it paints a clearer picture.

You should refrain from seeing everything here as one group against another. We are all gamers.

Anyways, had a fun chat. Don't ever change.

lol cmon, we are all gamers, but doesn't change there is a clear rivalry....is it so hard to ask we keep things 1 vs 1? They benefit both parties and are quite progressive when you think about it, removing any unecessary filters.

- stick to 1 vs 1 with no outside influences.

- count exclusives, but also multiplats not on the other. This provides a clear picture as to what differentiates between the two. This affects PS3 as well given their PS2 remastered to PS3 games, PS3/Vita titles, and PS3/PC titles. It truly benefits both parties and doesn't filter out great games that can't be played on the rival platform.

If you game on your PC, that's fine. But doesn't mean it should affect a true PS3/360 comparison. It isn't about your gaming preferences, but simply what one offers and the other can't, standing up on their own, individual terms.

Please tell me that you understand where I am coming from....this isn't as self serving as it is about just painting a clearer picture, win or loose.