Mr Khan said:
That makes no sense. The political leanings of the pro-choice tend to respect all sentient human life, at least in the desire to make sure that all people are guaranteed a minimal quality of life, as opposed to the pro-life, whose concern for the unborn only extends as far as not allowing women to terminate them. I mean, hell, conservatives oppose support for government-funded maternal health care in pretty much all its forms, so if the baby is miscarried through malnutrition, or a lack of health care on the mother's part, nobody sheds a tear. The pro-life movement is poorly named. All they care about is stopping abortion, but they care nothing for the actual life of the fetus or quality of life of the baby that fetus will become. |
Well, I don't know where you live but here in Canada we have the funding to support even the poorest of people to allow them to provide support for a child.
Also, since are on the opposing side of the argument you have not had to debate some of the lunatics who literally have absolutely no consideration for an unborn life whatsoever that they have such a blatent disregard to beleive that it is still a woman's choice to abort a child even after the child has exited the womb.
I'm not sure who you have spoken to, to come to the conclusion that pro choice people only care about the stopping the abortion and not the welfare of the child or the mother. Most people who I know who are por choice have the same idea that human life is precious and regardless of what situation you are born into whether it be the richest or poorest, every person deserve's a chance at life and considering most are christians (that i know), they usually donate money to help (at least in my church) the less fortunate and have outreach programs in the city.
" Rebellion Against Tyrants Is Obedience To God"







