enditall727 said:
Who is "arguing" only on speculation?
Have you read each of my posts in here?
Looks like somebody is getting angry ;) |
I should have used the word 'debate'. No, not angry, just realized we were debating two different things, LOL. Since the thread was about the verdict, I assumed you were debating the verdict itself (in which case using pure speculation wouldn't make sense), not just posting your own conjecture apart from that. Twas just a misunderstanding, that's all.







