timmah said:
enditall727 said:
timmah said:
Are you really going to blatently misrepresent what I'm saying? Really? I never said or insinuated anything of the sort. You have quite a habit of jumping to rash conclusions. I was simply explaining why there was reasonable doubt, and why her story cannot be considered as 100% fact by the jury, it has to be weighed along with other evidence and testimony. It's a simple matter of how a court of law is supposed to work, and how the jury is supposed to view testimony and evidence in total. I fully believe that she is confident that she heard Trayvon, I don't think she's lying about that, but you have to at least try to understand why a jury cannot take the testimony of one individual as gospel and decide the whole case on that, especially when there are so many what-ifs and seeming contradictions from other witnesses. The evidence and all the testimonies in total left reasonable doubt, so the jury could not convict. I'm at a loss as to why you can't grasp this simple concept. Maybe if she was the only witness and there were no physical evidence presented you'd have a point, that's not the case.
|
I dont care about the jury and didn't i say that it was speculation?
|
Got it. In that case I'm going to speculate that Trayvon was hopped up on vampire blood, thought he was a vampire God and was hovering above the ground, which is why Zimmerman thought he looked suspicous. If you're going to argue based only on speculation then there's no point in any of this.
|
Who is "arguing" only on speculation?
Have you read each of my posts in here?
Looks like somebody is getting angry ;)