tres said:
|
For God's sake, read the story! She got past her husband into the garage, got into her car, retrieved a gun, came back in the house, was pointing the gun at him, then discharged the weapon. This was from her testimony and his! There wasn't evidence to support any need for self defense at the time she fired, that's the problem. Is this stuff really this hard to grasp, or do people just make the first emotional, knee-jerk reaction that comes to mind and stick to it? My first reaction to the Zimmerman trial was that he was guilty (based on seeing it on CNN), until I researched and looked at the evidence about a week later. My first reaction to this story was that she should have gotten off, but then I went and read the actual facts in the case. If you bypass media sensationalism and actually read the facts, maybe you can make an informed decision from which to form an opinion.







