By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SxyxS on 15 July 2013
Edit Thread
JazzB1987 said:
SxyxS said:
JazzB1987 said:
The judge should get executed for being part of the 90% of stupid humanity.


so you think that 90% of all humans should be executed in the end?

Nothing would change as the remaining 10% will be the new 100% and you'll again have the 90% stupid here.

 

The question is wether the judge had a choice to rule in a different way.

As I know in the Unite States many prisons are run by private companies and this is where this problem really comes from imo and why such total stupid laws are made.

Those private prisons need to be filled 90%+ to be really profitable and when they sea that the population is too peaceful(few customers) and they can't fill their prisons 90%+ anymore they pay politicians like jeb bush to make more restrictiv laws.The more restrictive laws are,the more things that were legal before are now ciminalised.The more years the suspect is jailed the more money for the private prison can be earned.

And nothing is more effective in a coutry with lots of guns than 10-20 years prison for warning shots.

Well the new 100% would have to become stupid first.

And yes I forgot there is also the problem of private prisons....     tbh   prisons, post, ambulance, fire fighters, cops, hospitals, airports + the security, water, electricity, public transportation and stuff like the Federal Reserve  should NEVER ever be private.

especially the Federal Reserve as they have your country by the balls(the banking families that own and controle the FED like Morgans,Rockefeller and Rothschild=autonom city of london(even the queen of england has to ask for permission by the citys mayor if she wants to enter the city(no joke) and as the dollar is the world reserve currency they got the world by the balls in combination with the imf and world bank.

And prison in private hands = prisons are used for the interest of the prison owners and not to resocialise criminals-interest of people(that"s expensive).

Another Problem:Resocialised criminals will never ever come back=smaller profits.But if you treat a prisoner that way(keep him aggressive and uneducated)that he will become a criminal again he will return to your prison .

but back to topic

1)As soon as you remove the 90%stupid of a system(6.7 billion people) the remaining 10%(700mio) will become 100%

2)the remaining 100% will sooner or later be again divided into the upper 10%(70mio) and stupid 90%.(630mio)

3)this new stupid 90%(iq 120+) will be more intelligent than the previous 90%(iq 100)but they will still remain the stupid 90%and some people will complain about them,just on a higher level and if you again remove the stupid 90%(630mio) the new 100%(70mio)will be divided into 7mio intelligent and 63miostupid,those 63 mio stupid may have an iq of 130 but they will be stupid compared to the 7 mio iq150+ people .The only difference ,the new stupid haven an average iq of 130 instead of 100 but they will still be the stupid 90%.

You can"t solve anything with this because intelligence is relativ like almost all things and you will always have a situation where the more intelligent and better educated will look down to the rest and people being intelligent means nothing if they don't act reasonable.

Mohammed Atta was an architectual student,the boston bombers were students too-they didn't act like idiots because they were stupid but because they ignored reason and traded integrity for blind loyalty.The Judge who was responsible for this stupid verdict may have an IQ of 150 but he acted as an idiot because he followed obviously wrong rules.

It is better to follow the rules of reason and defend them than to try to eliminate 90% of the people.But if this is your wish,just do some research about the georgia guidestones-maybe your wishes will come true.