J_Allard said:
Actually no, when the state went for murder two, I knew he wouldn't be convicted. Even with the judge ruling in favor of a lesser charge being considered, you start out with murder and you f'd up as the prosecution in this case. And my opinion that Zimmerman is a scumbag who killed an innocent kid is based on nothing but fact and reality. I don't think you're aware that sometimes guilty people walk free and sometimes innocent people go to jail. And I don't really care what he said regarding his intentions. I am sure if I cared to, I could link to lots of articles with prosecution quotes about how they thought this trial would go before it ended. I don't think it worked out well for them. Trayvon's family will have a very strong case in civil court, same as many others who went that route even though the killer was found not guilty. Last reply I will have for you specifically, unlike you I am not emotionally invested in this and your responses are borderline flamebait mostly. |
I'm curious about what in my post seems emotional? Meanwhile you're referring to Zimmerman as a scumbag; that's a fairly emotive term.
While Zimmerman followed an innocent kid, he killed a guilty man. I don't think you have much of a rebuttal based upon evidence or fact. Mostly just supposition. Can you tell me what you think actually happened?
Like I said, O'Mara will seek immunity and win. His words - I think someone with 30 years experience knows what he's talking about, especially in comparison to some forum dweller.
