By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
POE said:
JayWood2010 said:


Would you consider a review correct without every achievement/trophy?

No double standards guys.  A game is not 100% complete until you have every achievement and trophy.  They also add difficulty to the games.


Haha, what? that´s your argument?
Ok let´s say it´s valid, let´s follow your logic:
So i don´t need to play every "real" part of a game to review it. In that case I should review super smash bros brawl by only playing it´s story mode.

No, I did beat NSMBU.  The secret world would be considered added content or extended gameplay from the main story to add to the gameplay (something i already played for 8 world, 4 worlds 100%).  People are saying that coins add to the difficulty and i disagree, but if people are going ot say that then it is no different than achivements/trophies which also are considering 100% the game and adds difficulty just like coins.  Are you telling me that those extra 4 levels i missed are going to change anything the review said?  Is that what you are saying?  Or are you saying me collecting those tedious coins/achievements/trophies are going to change my mind? It is not like i played it for an hour and put it down.  Far from that.  For the people who want to go collecting every coin (Perfectionist) they have that choice to do so, just like people have the choice to get every achievement but they still DO NOT change the core of the game.  Just added gameplay for the people who chose to do so.  I find this baffling that for some reason a Nintendo game should be treated differently because somehow collecting coins is more important than a platinum trophy on a PS3 game or getting 1000 gamerpoints on a Xbox game.  If that is the case then 99.9% of every review on every website is wrong because I gaurantee that they are not 100%