NYANKS said:
Couldn't it be he just sacrificed any possibility of living well in the hopes of making the country he actually cares about a better place? Assange can't move much either. He's not picking places based on how good they are, but if he can live without being in prison. That's what it seems like anyway. If he can enlighten the U.S. populace while limiting the damage he does I'd be happy. Also, everyone here assuming no other country is doing this stuff when they obviously are are a little out of touch no? |
I wouldn't really compare Snowden with a rapist. Paranoia aside Assange would be able to live just about anywhere but the US were it not for his penchant for rape. (and no... it really is "real" rape if you look at the criminal charges and accounts that were leaked, which amusingly assange was totally against being leaked.)
Even when it comes to leaking, the two did it in such totally different ways. Assange did it for fame and profit... and was having fun traveling around like nothing happened because nothing could be held against him.
Snowdon... I can't say he didn't do it for those things... but if he did he sure didn't make a good plan of it. Due to him actually committing a crime with his leaking he actually needs asylum. He's really much more analogus to Bradley Manning then Julian Assange.