By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
wilco on 10 July 2013
Edit Thread
bananaking21 said:
wilco said:
bananaking21 said:


like?


Changing their policy on online multiplayer, failure to support the vita, games still running at 30 fps and lower, the fact that their e3 show was actually pretty weak without the MS attack, etc.


so they should attack Sony for doing something that MS has been doing for 10 years? Vita gets tons of support, but they are mostly indie games and japanese games. not big AAA western games, which are coming soon with killzone and tear away. games still running at 30 FPS? so? that was the standard for years now. and its not like its a standard on xbox one, arguebly the best looking game ryse, runs at 30 FPS with drops. 

their E3 show showed tons of new games, FF15, KH3, mad max, the order 1886 and 7 other indie games, it also showed actual gameplay of games like destiny more gameplay for watch dogs and assassins creed. and it gave updates on the games they announced back in february back when they announced the console, killzone, infamous, knack, drive club and they showed. they also gave out the number of games they will publish in the first year which are 20, 5 more than microsoft, just because microsoft blew their load early and showed a lot of trailers with very little information about the game and sony didnt doesnt mean that their E3 should be bashed hard like you suggest. Sony also won on price, having considerably stronger hardware and being 100$ cheaper isnt something to scoff at


MS has been charging for online from the beginning and sony fans have always bragged about free online, now all of a sudden free online is no big deal? right... Your opinion about e3 is subjective but they received fewer best of e3 awards than ms and general consensus was that the stuff they did show was subpar with a show that lacked excitement up until the ms attack. Many journalists admit to giving sony e3 based solely on the ms attack and nothing more.